In today's dynamic business landscape, the strength of a team can be a deciding factor in the drive toward success. A team's effectiveness depends on how well it can work together to achieve its shared goals.
But what's the secret sauce to create an extraordinary team? While leadership, talent, and culture are all critical, it’s necessary for all of these elements to interact to unlock a team's full potential.
That’s where team effectiveness models come in. These well-structured guides, honed by experts, can give us the strategies we need to boost team performance. Whether you're nurturing a new team or seeking ways to invigorate an established one, these models can offer invaluable insights.
What are Team Effectiveness Models?
Team effectiveness models are dynamic tools designed to assess, analyze, and enhance a team's performance within an organization. They guide managers in building and nurturing high-performing teams. These models, developed by industry experts, combine behavioral science, management theory, and real-world experiences. They offer insights into the crucial factors that drive a team's success, from communication and collaboration to leadership and individual competencies.
These models are not a one-size-fits-all solution. The right model varies, depending on your team's unique needs and context. But, regardless of the model chosen, they all target improved team productivity, cohesion, and job satisfaction. When applied correctly, these models give you the insights you need to help boost productivity, foster positive team dynamics, and nurture an environment conducive to high performance.
Five Different Team Effectiveness Models
Unlocking the potential of a team can feel like an impossible puzzle at times. But if you understand different models of effective teams, this can help you start working towards it using proven tactics and techniques. Let's delve into five prominent models that have proven successful in various contexts.
- Tuckman's Stages of Group Development
Bruce Tuckman's model breaks team development into five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Initially, team members are polite and avoid conflicts ('forming'). As they get comfortable, disagreements may arise ('storming').
The 'norming' phase sees members resolving conflicts and developing team norms. In 'performing', the team works smoothly towards shared goals. 'Adjourning' refers to the stage where the team completes its task and disbands. Understanding these stages can help HR leaders navigate team growth and evolution over time. It empowers them to manage conflicts, nurture team cohesion, and promote high performance.
- Hackman's Input-Process-Output Model
Richard Hackman’s model outlines five conditions that must be present for teams to work together successfully. It considers the 'inputs' (team composition and leadership style), 'processes' (communication and conflict management), and 'outputs' (team performance and individual growth). This model is all about cause and effect — appropriate inputs and efficient processes result in desirable outputs.
A good leader can use Hackman's model to optimize inputs, fine-tune processes, and improve outputs. In essence, this model views a team as an interconnected system. It encourages leaders to focus on all three components for a holistic team development approach. Remember, understanding the connections can lead to valuable adjustments that drive better results.
- Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team
Patrick Lencioni's model identifies potential pitfalls that can hinder team effectiveness: lack of trust, fear or avoidance of conflict, lack of commitment, avoiding accountability, and inattention to results. His model serves as a diagnostic tool, helping leaders spot and address these dysfunctions head-on.
This model emphasizes the importance of trust and open communication in a team. It highlights the potential pitfalls and offers steps to overcome these hurdles for improved team dynamics. Addressing these dysfunctions is crucial for HR leaders. Teams can thrive if you can help them create a culture of trust by promoting conflict around ideas, encouraging commitment, fostering accountability, and maintaining a focus on results.
- Katzenbach and Smith's Team Performance Curve
This model, by Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith, distinguishes between working groups and high-performance teams. It suggests that a group of people working together doesn’t automatically become a great team. It defines a spectrum of team performance, starting from a 'working group', then progressing to a 'pseudo team', 'potential team', 'real team', and finally to a 'high-performance team'.
Each stage outlines the increasing levels of interdependence, commitment, and collective performance. This model serves as a roadmap to progress from a group of individuals working together to a cohesive, high-performing team. It can help HR managers in setting realistic expectations about team development. It serves as a reminder that team-building takes time and focused effort: High-performance isn't an overnight phenomenon.
- McGrath’s TIP Theory
Joseph McGrath’s TIP (Time, Interaction, and Performance) theory emphasizes the temporal aspect of team effectiveness. It views team development as cyclical rather than linear.
This model suggests that team tasks fall into two categories: 'performance' tasks that directly contribute to the team's goal and 'maintenance' tasks that sustain the team's ability to work together. By understanding and managing the timing and interplay of these tasks, teams can enhance their overall performance.
McGrath's model serves as a reminder of the importance of balancing task completion with team maintenance for long-term success. This model can help HR leaders understand the timing of team interactions and its influence on performance. It provides a lens to view the effects of time pressure and its management on team outcomes.
Watch journalist and author Charles Duhigg explain the insights he gathered while spending time with Google's Project Aristotle, a research team assembled to analyze how teams work.
Choosing the Right Effectiveness Model for Your Team
There are lots of different models of effective teams. Selecting the ideal model for your team hinges on several factors, including the team's current state, objectives, and specific challenges. Here are a few tips to guide your decision:
- Understand your team dynamics: Reflect on your team's unique characteristics. For example, if your team struggles with accountability and commitment, Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions model might be the best fit.
- Consider your goals: Align the model with your team's objectives. If your aim is to improve overall performance and individual growth, Hackman's Input-Process-Output model could be the ideal choice.
- Factor in the team's development stage: Tuckman's model is excellent for teams in the early stages of formation, or if your team's dynamics have significantly shifted and it feels like starting from scratch.
- Think about the nature of the team's work: If your team is highly productive as individuals, but finds it hard to work together, McGrath’s TIP theory might provide valuable insights.
- Reflect on your leadership style: Some models might align better with your management style. If you lead with a more interconnected and interdependent approach, the Katzenbach and Smith's Team Performance Curve might resonate.
Remember, these models are tools to enhance understanding and facilitate action, not prescriptive formulas. They serve as a starting point to explore and experiment. As you try out different models, try to stay flexible, and keep an open dialogue with your team to understand how effective they feel the team is. This approach will lead you to the model — or combination of models — that best suits your team's unique needs and propels you towards success.
Once You Understand Your Team’s Effectiveness, You Can Look for Opportunities to Improve It
These models all aim to help you better understand how effective your team is, and identify ways to help them work better together. But sometimes you need to look outside your team, to find other opportunities to boost team morale and performance.
Many companies have found that investing in employee health and wellness improves employee engagement and job performance — which is bound to have an impact on team performance, too. Nine out of 10 of companies that measure their wellness program’s return see a positive return on wellbeing, Gympass found in its 2023 Return on Wellbeing Study.
Similarly, Aflac found that 70% of workers enrolled in a workplace wellness program have reported “higher job satisfaction” after enrollment. A tailored employee wellness program can provide workers with access to resources that support their individual health and wellbeing journeys.
Learn more about how you can support your employees by investing in a workplace wellness program. Speak with one of our wellbeing specialists today!
- Aflac (n.d.) The 2022-2023 Aflac WorkForces Report. Retrieved July 25, 2023 from https://www.aflac.com/business/resources/aflac-workforces-report/default.aspx
- Brightplan (n.d.) Four Critical Steps You Need to Take to Promote Employee Wellness and Maximize Engagement. Retrieved July 25, 2023 from https://www.brightplan.com/webinar/four-critical-steps-you-need-to-take-to-promote-employee-wellness-and-maximize-engagement
The Gympass Editorial Team empowers HR leaders to support worker wellbeing. Our original research, trend analyses, and helpful how-tos provide the tools they need to improve workforce wellness in today's fast-shifting professional landscape.